From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14253 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2001 04:04:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12028 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2001 04:03:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 04:03:24 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (taarna.cygnus.com [205.180.230.102]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA04175 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from aldyh@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBH46CE16067; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:06:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: aldyh set sender to aldyh@redhat.com using -f Subject: Re: rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS From: Aldy Hernandez To: David Edelsohn Cc: gcc external In-Reply-To: <200112170355.WAA22768@makai.watson.ibm.com> References: <200112170355.WAA22768@makai.watson.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 21:59:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1008561969.20065.346.camel@litecycle.cc.andrews.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00886.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 19:55, David Edelsohn wrote: > >>>>> Aldy Hernandez writes: > > Aldy> is there a reason why NON_SPECIAL_REGS is not the exact bit opposite of > Aldy> SPECIAL_REGS? > > Aldy> { 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0x00000008, 0x00000000 }, /* NON_SPECIAL_REGS */ \ > > Aldy> { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000007, 0x00000000 }, /* SPECIAL_REGS */ \ > > Because the name is not accurate? It really is the union of > GENERAL_REGS and FLOAT_REGS. ahh, that explains my float failures when i "fix" non_special_regs. thx > > David -- Aldy Hernandez E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com Professional Gypsy Red Hat, Inc.