From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13858 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2001 12:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13829 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2001 12:23:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2001 12:23:38 -0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA27325; Sun, 25 Nov 01 07:17:59 EST Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:14:00 -0000 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10111251217.AA27325@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> To: neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk Subject: Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00686.txt.bz2 I'd also like to see us go down the road that rth mentioned, i.e. losing all trees with side effects You mean like MODIFY_EXPR and CALL_EXPR? :-) That would get rid of {UN,}SAVE_EXPR I don't see how to get rid of SAVE_EXPR without taking some preformance hits on complex types. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) To: neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 04:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <10111251217.AA27325@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg01190.html Message-ID: <20011125042300.Ewkk0OJccva8lCcysCtHrZM24K-u8rxezIXFr-dgMsI@z> I'd also like to see us go down the road that rth mentioned, i.e. losing all trees with side effects You mean like MODIFY_EXPR and CALL_EXPR? :-) That would get rid of {UN,}SAVE_EXPR I don't see how to get rid of SAVE_EXPR without taking some preformance hits on complex types.