From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29043 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2001 14:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29022 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2001 14:42:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2001 14:42:05 -0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA27856; Sun, 25 Nov 01 09:36:27 EST Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:19:00 -0000 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10111251436.AA27856@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> To: neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk Subject: Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00696.txt.bz2 No, I think you'd remove a lot of the special-casing that SAVE_EXPR causes (and weirdness). Also, the tree->RTL layer wouldn't have to special case it either. Try it and I think you'll find that all the complexity is semantically required: if you don't put it in one way, it'll have to go in some other way. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) To: neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: ICE in change_address at emit_rtl.c Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 06:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <10111251436.AA27856@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg01200.html Message-ID: <20011125064200.KgAfggWGh_eeeX6ONA6kK9x_VLPBktvNe4kGk0UUoI0@z> No, I think you'd remove a lot of the special-casing that SAVE_EXPR causes (and weirdness). Also, the tree->RTL layer wouldn't have to special case it either. Try it and I think you'll find that all the complexity is semantically required: if you don't put it in one way, it'll have to go in some other way.