From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10641 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2001 16:17:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10614 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 16:17:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2001 16:17:33 -0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA16876; Tue, 4 Dec 01 11:11:58 EST Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 08:17:00 -0000 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10112041611.AA16876@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> To: jsm28@cam.ac.uk Subject: Re: gcc-ss-20011203 is now available Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 Could people please ensure that they commit each logical patch (such that users should not try to build an intermediate state) in a single commit with all relevant files named on the command line? I certainly agree with that. However, it is important to point out that it's not always possible to put them all on the command line due to command-line length restrictions on some systems. I've run into that myself once a few months ago. So this sort of inconsistency is inevitable, though hopefully rare.