From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42313-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3038 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2001 23:30:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2972 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 23:30:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 23:30:36 -0000
Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34)
	id AA26526; Wed, 5 Dec 01 18:25:06 EST
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 15:30:00 -0000
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Message-Id: <10112052325.AA26526@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Failing G++ tests on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0c.
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2

When I fixed the varasm problem, the only failures I get are
these:

FAIL: g++.dg/ext/align1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/instantiate1.C suppressing f<int> (test for errors, line )
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/instantiate1.C suppressing A<int> (test for errors, line )
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/instantiate1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/initp1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate2.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 19)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate3.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.jason/thunk3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/defarg9.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/enum5.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.pt/explicit74.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.pt/instantiate5.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb101.C (test for excess errors)

Looking at the logs, most of these seem to be ones that have already
been discussed and are known problems.  Are there any I need to look
at?  I also get about a half dozen loader warnings about missing strong
symbols for a sizable fraction of tests, but they don't fail.