From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22547 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2001 11:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22499 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 11:18:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 11:18:01 -0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA05972; Fri, 7 Dec 01 06:12:36 EST Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 03:32:00 -0000 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10112071112.AA05972@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> To: shebs@apple.com Subject: Re: More code removal, mips ecoff support Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 Woo, end of another era. Well, you don't see many Irix 4 or Mipsco systems around anymore, and the only embedded users will be doing r3000s of some flavor, so not much chance for user objections. Perhaps not much chance of user objects from people *on this list*, but I think removing support when there are still systems around is a bad idea. Keeping support for them is not that much work. Isn't ecoff also used on Alpha? I have a distinct recollection that it's the default on the Alpha I use.