From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24437 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2001 12:05:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24407 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2001 12:05:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2001 12:05:53 -0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA27449; Tue, 18 Dec 01 07:00:38 EST Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 04:56:00 -0000 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10112181200.AA27449@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> To: mark@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: Freeze timing and questions Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00984.txt.bz2 Yes. Let's by all means be flexible; I will not personally jump down anyone's throat about anything here. On the other hand, as reviewers, let's please try to be conservative, and stay within the spirit of the thing: patches that fix problems in the compiler. I think we also need to vary things over time. We should be much more likely to consider something that's somewhere between a new feature and a bug fix as a bug fix now than we would in five weeks.