From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-62078-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13384 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2002 01:02:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13316 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2002 01:02:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2002 01:02:09 -0000
Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34)
	id AA21804; Mon, 21 Oct 02 21:02:49 EDT
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:15:00 -0000
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Message-Id: <10210220102.AA21804@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
To: dalej@apple.com
Subject: Re: Question on insn scheduling and SP
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01302.txt.bz2

    I fixed it here:

    > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg00838.html

    See also followups, I didn't get it right the first time:(

But there is already a reference to MEM in the case I'm looking at and
I don't see the place in sched where it says that MEMs conflict with
stack_pointer_rtx.