public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
To: drow@mvista.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: A testcase library
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10212240145.AA23279@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> (raw)

    Suppose that GDB is debugging a program, and the information it needs
    is simply missing from the debug info.  Zilch, nada, absolutely no way
    to recover it.  That's an XFAIL.

    Suppose that a testcase is for a new bug that no one's figured out how
    to fix yet.  That's a KFAIL.  All KFAILs are required to have an open PR
    associated with them, at least in GDB-land.

    The difference, in theory, is that KFAILs represent real problems that
    have not been fixed; and XFAILs represent "expected" failures, problems
    in the system or tools that can not be fixed in the program-under-test. 

I still don't get it.  Your first example sounds like something that's not
a bug at all, in which case why would the "test case" still be in the suite?

             reply	other threads:[~2002-12-24  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-23 18:42 Richard Kenner [this message]
2002-12-23 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-24 12:28 ` David Carlton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-23 18:08 Richard Kenner
2002-12-24 12:30 ` David Carlton
2002-12-20  8:12 Volker Reichelt
2002-12-20  8:14 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-12-20  8:50   ` Volker Reichelt
2002-12-20  9:12     ` Eric Botcazou
2002-12-20  9:32       ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2002-12-20 10:51         ` Volker Reichelt
2002-12-20 12:02     ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-12-22 22:44     ` Ben Elliston
2002-12-23 12:46       ` Mike Stump
2002-12-23 12:57         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-23 15:54           ` Mike Stump
2002-12-23 16:35             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-23 13:50         ` Ben Elliston
2002-12-23 14:00           ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-23 15:27             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-20 15:01   ` Joseph S. Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10212240145.AA23279@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --to=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).