From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4143 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2002 21:55:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4131 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2002 21:55:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wanadoo.nl) (194.134.35.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2002 21:55:49 -0000 Received: from steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl (94dyn189.com21.casema.net [62.234.25.189]) by smtp1.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08505B230 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:55:38 +0200 (MEST) Subject: Test suite for new front end: DejaGNU or QMtest From: Steven Bosscher To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 18:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1025474049.733.71.camel@steven> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg01766.txt.bz2 Hello, Now that G95 generates some code, we'll soon need to be able to run test cases. Eventually we want to integrate G95 in GCC, so I guess we should write test cases for the testing framework that GCC will use in the future. GCC uses DejaGNU now, but I read in some post that g++ will use QMtest in the (near?) future, and that other parts of GCC will use it, too. So should a new front-end test suite use DejaGNU or QMtest? Greetz Steven