public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
To: guerby@acm.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10303281144.AA28312@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> (raw)

    What are the arguments behind "best" here? Are the ACT releases built in
    maintainer-mode? Same question for binary distributors like Linux
    vendors? 

The issue isn't how releases are built, but what's required to verify that
a patch doesn't break anything.

    That's why I by far prefer to have the testing being done after
    install, and not in build like it is done for GCC via DejaGNU now. 

No, builds seem right.  I don't want to have to install a compiler in
order to test it.

             reply	other threads:[~2003-03-28 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-28 12:06 Richard Kenner [this message]
2003-03-28 13:59 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-04-02 22:17   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-04-02 23:00     ` Laurent Guerby
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-31  5:17 Richard Kenner
2003-03-30 23:14 Robert Dewar
2003-03-28 18:52 Richard Kenner
2003-03-28 19:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-28 15:00 Robert Dewar
2003-03-28 14:53 Richard Kenner
2003-03-28 14:57 ` Matthieu Moy
2003-03-28 14:59 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-28 14:47 Richard Kenner
2003-03-28 14:50 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-28 11:50 Richard Kenner
2003-03-28 12:03 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-28 18:30   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-29 11:47     ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-28 16:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-27  9:20 Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Michael Ritzert
2003-03-27 23:24 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-27 23:29   ` ACATS & GCC testsuite (Was Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7) Arnaud Charlet
2003-03-27 23:38     ` ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
2003-03-28  4:07       ` Geert Bosch
2003-03-28 11:35         ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-28 19:48           ` Geert Bosch
2003-03-28 21:57             ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-29 13:28               ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-03-29 13:45                 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-30 14:47                   ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-03-30 14:55                     ` Andreas Jaeger
2003-03-30 15:46                       ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-03-30 22:08                         ` Andreas Jaeger
2003-03-31  7:22                           ` Kai Henningsen
2003-03-30 15:31                     ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-30 19:10                       ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-03-30 22:09                         ` Laurent Guerby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10303281144.AA28312@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --to=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=guerby@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).