From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-73857-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15381 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 21:21:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15361 invoked from network); 10 May 2003 21:21:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2003 21:21:57 -0000
Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34)
	id AA24833; Sat, 10 May 03 17:26:39 EDT
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:21:00 -0000
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Message-Id: <10305102126.AA24833@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
To: hainque@act-europe.fr
Subject: Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01029.txt.bz2

    FWIW, it passes almost 100% of the chapter C tests in the ACAT 2.4
    series, on a real target. This includes, amongst others, hundreds of
    tests related to Ada tasking and exceptions handling, often intermixed
    in very convoluted ways.

Yes, but with which EH?  Zack's claim is that the use of GCC EH would cause
link errors.