From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-80755-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6515 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2003 20:31:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6500 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2003 20:31:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2003 20:31:37 -0000
Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34)
	id AA09411; Thu, 7 Aug 03 16:38:04 EDT
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 21:08:00 -0000
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Message-Id: <10308072038.AA09411@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
To: rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problem in split_basic_block
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00445.txt.bz2

    ia64-vms really isn't going to use addp4 style extension?

I'm pretty sure not: it's only HPUX that's using it.  They are handling
it the same way as VMS on Alpha.