* [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing, was: Mainline merge 2002-09-03
@ 2002-09-05 13:25 innenminister
2002-09-06 8:35 ` libmudflap porting: was Re: [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: innenminister @ 2002-09-05 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Since the merge I need <execinfo.h> (to build libmudflap).
Since this is a glibc specific file I don't have it on my system
which runs cygwin. (I'm using the the tree-ssa-branch for g95, and I
can still build this, but the errors building libmudflap are
annoying).
Thank you,
- Tobias Schlüter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* libmudflap porting: was Re: [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing
2002-09-05 13:25 [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing, was: Mainline merge 2002-09-03 innenminister
@ 2002-09-06 8:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-09-06 8:46 ` Diego Novillo
2002-09-07 19:56 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2002-09-06 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: innenminister; +Cc: gcc
innenminister@gmx.de writes:
> Since the merge I need <execinfo.h> (to build libmudflap).
> Since this is a glibc specific file I don't have it on my system
> which runs cygwin. [...]
Sorry - we have not yet begun to port libmudflap to other hosts.
(Help wanted! :-) In the interim, I recommend you remove your copy of
the libmudflap source subtree entirely (cvs release -d libmudflap), so
it won't be in your way. Should libmudflap be explicitly excluded
from the CVS "gcc-full" and "gcc-core" modules for now?
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: libmudflap porting: was Re: [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing
2002-09-06 8:35 ` libmudflap porting: was Re: [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing Frank Ch. Eigler
@ 2002-09-06 8:46 ` Diego Novillo
2002-09-07 19:56 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Diego Novillo @ 2002-09-06 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: innenminister, gcc
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 11:35, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Should libmudflap be explicitly excluded
> from the CVS "gcc-full" and "gcc-core" modules for now?
>
I vote no. It's a branch. Breakage like this is good as a reminder of
things we still need to get done.
Diego.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: libmudflap porting: was Re: [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing
2002-09-06 8:35 ` libmudflap porting: was Re: [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-09-06 8:46 ` Diego Novillo
@ 2002-09-07 19:56 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2002-09-07 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: innenminister, gcc
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:35:32AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> (Help wanted! :-) In the interim, I recommend you remove your copy of
> the libmudflap source subtree entirely ...
Alternately, modify the top-level configure such that we
don't build libmudflap except on x86 linux.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-08 2:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-05 13:25 [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing, was: Mainline merge 2002-09-03 innenminister
2002-09-06 8:35 ` libmudflap porting: was Re: [tree-ssa-branch] execinfo.h missing Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-09-06 8:46 ` Diego Novillo
2002-09-07 19:56 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).