public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
@ 2002-10-07  9:03 vargenau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: vargenau @ 2002-10-07  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pfeifer; +Cc: janis187, Joe.Buck, gcc, vargenau

>>Illegal DOCTYPE
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg00822.html
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/2002-01/msg00551.html
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-01/msg00663.html
> 
> 
> I fail to see the problem here. Does it complain because there are
> comments before the DOCTYPE or is the DOCTYPE really an invalid/obsolete
> one?
> 
> Gerald

In these three pages, the DOCTYPE used is
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN">
that does not correspond to any current version of HTML from W3C.

The official list of DOCTYPE's can be found at
http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list

From this page:

HTML 2.0  DTD

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">

HTML 3.2 DTD

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN">

HTML 4.01 Strict, Transitional, Frameset

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Frameset//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/frameset.dtd">
	

XHTML 1.0 Strict, Transitional, Frameset

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Frameset//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-frameset.dtd">
	

XHTML 1.1 DTD

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" 
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
	
Regards,

-- 
Marc-Etienne Vargenau http://vargenau.free.fr
Membre du Cercle généalogique norvillois http://www.cgnorvillois.org
Mes données sont indexées sur Généanet http://www.geneanet.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
  2002-10-04  8:15   ` vargenau
@ 2002-10-04 10:14     ` Gerald Pfeifer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2002-10-04 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vargenau; +Cc: Janis Johnson, Joe Buck, gcc

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 vargenau@free.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/

Okay, this is generated externaly and we cannot easily fix that; in
fact, we probably simply should remove it.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-announce/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++-cvs/

Fixed manually.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77/News.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Contributors.html

Generated automatically using makeinfo, where we are currently in
contact with the maintainer.

> Illegal DOCTYPE
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg00822.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/2002-01/msg00551.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-01/msg00663.html

I fail to see the problem here. Does it complain because there are
comments before the DOCTYPE or is the DOCTYPE really an invalid/obsolete
one?

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
  2002-10-04  6:42 ` PATCH for http://gcc.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2002-10-04  8:15   ` vargenau
  2002-10-04 10:14     ` Gerald Pfeifer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: vargenau @ 2002-10-04  8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: vargenau, Janis Johnson, Joe Buck, gcc

En réponse à Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>:

> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 vargenau@free.fr wrote:
> > Some pages have additional problems:
> > - some pages lack the DOCTYPE declaration
> 
> Which ones?  (Please note that those under /onlinedocs are generated
> automatically, so unless there is a serious problem, we probably won't
> start tweaking them, though of course we'll try to get the tools we
> have
> been using updated.)

As I explained in my inital message, I have used 
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/
to check your pages recursively.
It allows to check a maximum of 100 pages, so my list is not
exhaustive.

http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-announce/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++-cvs/

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77/News.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Contributors.html

Illegal DOCTYPE
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg00822.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/2002-01/msg00551.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-01/msg00663.html
 
Best regards,

-- 
Marc-Etienne Vargenau http://vargenau.free.fr
Membre du Cercle généalogique norvillois http://www.cgnorvillois.org
Mes données sont indexées sur Généanet http://www.geneanet.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
  2002-10-04  5:09 http://gcc.gnu.org vargenau
@ 2002-10-04  6:42 ` Gerald Pfeifer
  2002-10-04  8:15   ` vargenau
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2002-10-04  6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vargenau; +Cc: Janis Johnson, Joe Buck, gcc

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 vargenau@free.fr wrote:
> Some pages have additional problems:
> - some pages lack the DOCTYPE declaration

Which ones?  (Please note that those under /onlinedocs are generated
automatically, so unless there is a serious problem, we probably won't
start tweaking them, though of course we'll try to get the tools we have
been using updated.)

> - in page cvs.html, there are illegal "<" and ">" characters

Fixed by the patch below.

> - in page libstdc++/ you have a misplaced <a name="download">

Also fixed by the patch below.

We are now trying to get makeinfo (which we use to generate parts of the
documentation in HTML format) updated to support XHTML, and I have already
started hacking our scripts to add a proper DOCTYPE where we are not fully
XHTML compliant.

Thanks for your comments,
Gerald

Index: cvs.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/cvs.html,v
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -u -3 -p -r1.78 cvs.html
--- cvs.html	16 Sep 2002 19:24:45 -0000	1.78
+++ cvs.html	4 Oct 2002 11:52:16 -0000
@@ -178,7 +178,8 @@ you may want to check out include:</p>
   <li>mips-3_4-rewrite-branch: This branch is for largish rewrites to the
       mips backend.  This has a long term goal of no macro instructions and
       updating the port to the current infrastructure.  Send patches to
-      Eric Christopher <<a href="mailto:echristo@redhat.com">echristo@redhat.com</a>> and CC: <<a href="mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org">gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org</a>> for inclusion.</li>
+      Eric Christopher &lt;<a href="mailto:echristo@redhat.com">echristo@redhat.com</a>&gt;
+      and CC: &lt;<a href="mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org">gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org</a>&gt;.</li>
 </ul>
Index: libstdc++/index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/libstdc++/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -3 -p -r1.26 index.html
--- libstdc++/index.html	15 Jul 2002 20:02:53 -0000	1.26
+++ libstdc++/index.html	4 Oct 2002 12:05:17 -0000
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@

 <hr />

-<a name="download"><h3>Downloading</h3></a>
+<h3><a name="download">Downloading</a></h3>

 <p>Snapshots are located in the GCC FTP area, in the libstdc++ subdirectory,
    <code>&lt;URL:ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/libstdc++/&gt;</code>.  You will
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@
    out the <code>gcc</code> module will also get the library sources; to
    retrieve only the library, check out the <code>libstdc++-v3</code> module
    instead.
+</p>

 </td></tr></table></td></tr></table>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-07  9:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-07  9:03 PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org vargenau
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-04  5:09 http://gcc.gnu.org vargenau
2002-10-04  6:42 ` PATCH for http://gcc.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer
2002-10-04  8:15   ` vargenau
2002-10-04 10:14     ` Gerald Pfeifer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).