From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-89311-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18086 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 12:29:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18076 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 12:29:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 12:29:40 -0000
Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34)
	id AA27790; Mon, 19 Jan 04 07:31:53 EST
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:29:00 -0000
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Message-Id: <10401191231.AA27790@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
To: rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01266.txt.bz2

    Did you not read my message?  The test I gave *was* C.

I read it, but obviously not carefully enough!

I knew the original code in that PR was C++ and then saw your C++ comment
in the last paragraph and missed the point that you'd used the C version
in that PR.

I stand corrected.