From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-64875-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5872 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2002 19:19:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5841 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2002 19:19:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nicole.de.interearth.com) (213.7.85.49)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2002 19:19:10 -0000
Received: from sonja (sonja [192.168.11.7])
	by nicole.de.interearth.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 83B6040EC; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:47:17 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: source mgt....[_HAS_ gcc relevance]
From: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>
To: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
Cc: GCC Developer Mailinglist <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <8765tt9i0b.fsf@fadata.bg>
References: <20021216101629.C620EF2E46@nile.gnat.com>
	 <200212161105.DAA06401@emf.net> <87n0n5wldh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	 <8765tt9i0b.fsf@fadata.bg>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-r72AG1M2mYIlxfOc3JnL"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1040150952.20408.12.camel@sonja>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:41:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01049.txt.bz2


--=-r72AG1M2mYIlxfOc3JnL
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-length: 860

Am Die, 2002-12-17 um 09.17 schrieb Momchil Velikov:

> And rightfully so.  Aegis' model of "change" assignments to developers
> doesn't quite fit the volunteer driven projects.

And it's pain in the rear to use. Frankly _I_ want a system consisting=20
of _one_ swiss army knife tool and not dotzend of more or less obviously
christened tools cluttering up /usr/bin. The system has to be easy to
explore, not necessarily to setup, and the basic features have to be
easily accessible; cvs and subversion provide that, bk not to that
extend but Aegis is far down the drain in this regard.
I claim that having a CM tools which is trivial to get started with is
important to not scare possible volunteers away, as a rule of a thumb
no more than 3 (better 2) easily explainable steps should be necessary
to retrieve a specific version.

--=20
Servus,
       Daniel

--=-r72AG1M2mYIlxfOc3JnL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Content-length: 189

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9/3Gochlzsq9KoIYRAlytAKCOaU4L3fOoxNjL9qU8/tqjoM9Y3wCfTkQr
DA6b3f0UE6HUglO+E4MP0nI=
=rrhp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-r72AG1M2mYIlxfOc3JnL--