From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23945 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2004 21:09:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23930 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 21:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 21:09:12 -0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA03996; Wed, 4 Feb 04 16:11:45 EST Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:09:00 -0000 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10402042111.AA03996@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> To: rth@redhat.com Subject: Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 For the record, I believe PLACEHOLDER_EXPR and WITH_RECORD_EXPR should be nodes in GENERIC, since Ada is not the only language that has variant records of this sort. I'm not convinced that WITH_RECORD_EXPR needs to be there. If you're going to simplify the result by doing the substition, why have the node in the first place: why not just do the substitution instead of making node?