From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-95185-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16939 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2004 20:09:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16932 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 20:09:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2004 20:09:07 -0000
Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34)
	id AA05553; Fri, 30 Apr 04 16:09:36 EDT
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 22:22:00 -0000
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Message-Id: <10404302009.AA05553@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
To: ian@wasabisystems.com
Subject: Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01475.txt.bz2

    Is the problem that -fzero-initialized-in-bss is causing a zero
    initialized variable to become a common variable?  A BSS variable
    should not be a common variable.  That would be wrong.

That's my understanding, but I could be misunderstanding.