From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13269 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2004 00:48:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13260 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2004 00:48:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2004 00:48:29 -0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA22457; Sun, 29 Aug 04 20:51:20 EDT Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:59:00 -0000 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10408300051.AA22457@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> To: pinskia@physics.uc.edu Subject: Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01429.txt.bz2 PS I should also note Ada still does not build at least at the last know report, we got from Kenner and other Ada Core people. Right. I was away for a week and couldn't work on it. The problem was first the integer cache and then some random change that made a kludge that was used for TYPE_LANG_SPECIFIC no longer work. The first was fixed in that code and I removed the kludge today. Right now with my tree I have a bootstrap, but one of the ACATS tests that at one point worked regressed. I'm going to try to get things more checked in before dealing with that regression since what I have is far better tnan what's checked in now. I think there are still a handful of things where it isn't clear exactly how to fix things, but I need to go through stuff more methodically to see exactly what they are. That should happen in the next 2-3 days. Because any remaining bugs can be fixed in Stage 3, I don't see Ada as a constraint on the 3.5 schedule. Speaking of Ada, I assume we'll follow the same procedures we did in 3.4 and let Arno be the judge of what changes can go into the Ada files when, correct?