public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
To: phil@codesourcery.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Release numbering
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10408301006.AA23682@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> (raw)

    Trying to get the SC to hand down a 4.0 decision now will cause tension,
    fights, disagreement, plagues, etc.  Why not work together to create a
    release that we can agree is worthy of the name 4.0?  Why does it have to
    be forced through now?

Because the difference between the next release and this one will be *far*
less than between 3.4 and this one.  If people didn't feel this level of
changes merited "4.0", the next level certainly wouldn't.

             reply	other threads:[~2004-08-30 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-30 10:11 Richard Kenner [this message]
2004-08-30 10:45 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 11:24 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-30 14:54   ` Jeffrey A Law
2004-08-30 14:57     ` Steven Bosscher
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-30  1:51 Richard Kenner
2004-08-30  1:59 ` Phil Edwards
2004-08-30  3:55   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 10:04     ` Phil Edwards
2004-08-30 10:22       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 18:42         ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-08-30 20:46           ` Phil Edwards
2004-08-30 20:57         ` Per Bothner
2004-08-30 21:02           ` Zack Weinberg
2004-08-30 21:49           ` Joseph S. Myers
     [not found]       ` <phil@codesourcery.com>
2004-08-30 14:42         ` David Edelsohn
2004-08-30 14:23   ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-30  4:10 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 12:12   ` Laurent GUERBY

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10408301006.AA23682@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --to=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=phil@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).