From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105884-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23514 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2004 12:59:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23460 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 12:59:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 2004 12:59:45 -0000
Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34)
	id AA21742; Sun, 28 Nov 04 08:04:20 EST
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:41:00 -0000
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Message-Id: <10411281304.AA21742@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
To: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl
Subject: Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg01077.txt.bz2

    Be aware of the maximL "Those who make no mistake usually make nothing".

    I.e., any measure of regressionist behaviour should be offset 
    (normalized) by the number of successful changes the person has made.

I don't think anybody was proposing to use the regression information
to "rate" submitters in any way, just to do a preliminary bug assignment.