From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65509-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20287 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2002 22:49:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20213 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2002 22:48:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout02.sul.t-online.com) (194.25.134.17)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2002 22:48:08 -0000
Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 18TVAy-0005Zk-05; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 23:47:56 +0100
Received: from webmail.t-online.de (0620532566-0001@[172.18.16.212]) by fwd07.bbul.t-online.de
	with smtp id 18TVAm-1HlHY8C; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 23:47:44 +0100
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC still getting a lot slower
From: Ritzert@t-online.de
Cc: neroden@twcny.rr.com
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 23:01:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1041374635.3e121dabd8c8d@webmail.t-online.de>
X-Complaints-To: abuse#webmail@t-online.com
X-Sender: 0620532566-0001@t-dialin.net
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01683.txt.bz2

Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Can we test compile time change of some *fixed* piece of code,
perhaps?

Have a look at http://www.globe-tec.de/~ritzert/STLport.png . The plot
shows the time it takes to compile STLport on a Pentium II 400. The raw
data is at
http://www.globe-tec.de/~ritzert/STLport.times .

The latest jump is here:
16/12/2002 1901.45
17/12/2002 1981.24
a 4.2% increase.

Happy new year everyone!
Michael