From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11753 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2003 19:14:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11739 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2003 19:14:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO doubledemon.codesourcery.com) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2003 19:14:32 -0000 Received: from doubledemon.codesourcery.com (doubledemon.codesourcery.com [127.0.0.1]) by doubledemon.codesourcery.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2UJEVfT004430; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:14:31 -0800 Subject: Re: Converting to ISO C89 From: Mark Mitchell To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: <200303250642.h2P6gZ4r025932@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 05:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1049051672.31975.323.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01783.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 00:15, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Mark Mitchell writes: > > [...] > > | The verdict is in: it is OK to assume ISO C89 in all code in GCC > | proper. (In other words, libiberty and/or other libraries are not > | affected.) > > This patchlet modifies the Makefile machinery to support that > decision. OK to install? Yes, that's fine. -- Mark