From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Converting to ISO C89
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1049992269.27573.3.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16021.32483.528431.369019@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 07:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Mark Mitchell writes:
> >
> > The SC has finally finished voting on ISO C89 conversion. (The
> > mailing list for the SC experienced some problems, which caused things
> > to bog down a bit.)
> >
> > The verdict is in: it is OK to assume ISO C89 in all code in GCC
> > proper. (In other words, libiberty and/or other libraries are not
> > affected.)
> >
> > So, patches to do ISO C conversions on the mainline are hereby
> > pre-approved with one caveat: I would appreciate it if people would
> > wait until GCC 3.3 is out the door. The reason is that we're still
> > applying a lot of patches to both branches, and that process is tricky
> > enough without creating a lot of spurious merge conflicts.
>
> I take it that new patches which are written in ISO C may be applied
> to the 3.3 branch.
I can't see why not.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-10 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-25 7:12 Mark Mitchell
2003-03-25 12:12 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-25 17:38 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-03-25 18:25 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-03-25 20:38 ` Raja R Harinath
2003-03-25 21:55 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-25 22:02 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-03-25 22:17 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-25 22:25 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-03-26 9:19 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-26 0:05 ` Joe Buck
2003-03-26 6:56 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-25 22:13 ` Raja R Harinath
2003-03-25 22:23 ` tm_gccmail
2003-03-25 22:26 ` Joe Buck
2003-03-25 22:40 ` Raja R Harinath
2003-03-26 8:49 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-26 9:55 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-04-06 2:11 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-06 2:46 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-04-06 2:47 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-06 3:15 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-04-06 4:40 ` Geoff Keating
2003-04-06 16:23 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-03-30 12:45 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-31 5:17 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-04-03 1:06 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-04-12 17:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-04-12 18:06 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-04-10 15:31 ` Andrew Haley
2003-04-10 16:42 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2003-04-12 19:32 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-04-14 11:21 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-04-14 12:57 ` Andrew Haley
2003-04-16 10:42 ` Andrew Haley
2003-04-16 17:25 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1049992269.27573.3.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).