From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23236 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2005 16:10:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23175 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2005 16:10:03 -0000 Received: from vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with SMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:10:03 +0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA01026; Mon, 11 Jul 05 12:12:15 EDT Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:10:00 -0000 From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10507111612.AA01026@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> To: dnovillo@redhat.com Subject: Re: Some notes on the Wiki Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00427.txt.bz2 I believe the Wiki is an invaluable documentation tool, precisely because it allows such an unencumbered contribution process. I agree. I wasn't suggesting that the Wiki has no value, but rather that it's not a substitute for the more formal documentation. Were it not for copyright issues, one could view the Wiki as an ongoing draft process for the documentation.