From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23865 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 17:11:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23856 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 17:11:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.73.237.138) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 17:11:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 30599 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 17:11:42 -0000 Received: from 227.148-60-66-fuji-dsl.static.surewest.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (mitchell@66.60.148.227) by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 May 2003 17:11:42 -0000 Subject: Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390 From: Mark Mitchell To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: rth@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200305071702.TAA11631@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <200305071702.TAA11631@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC Message-Id: <1052327506.23765.49.camel@minax.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 17:11:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 > I will continue to work on a cleaner solution, but I cannot > guarantee that this will succeed within 24 hours (and I'd > also like to ask for Richard's opinion). > > Do you think we should use the patch below for 3.3? Yes -- but please enclose the second hunk in #ifdef as well. If we're going to be ugly, let's not try to be smart while we're being ugly. Please check this in, and close the PR. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC