From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-74165-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25415 invoked by alias); 13 May 2003 17:50:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25348 invoked from network); 13 May 2003 17:50:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 May 2003 17:50:47 -0000
Received: from localhost (tornado.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.228])
	by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 447D8800090; Tue, 13 May 2003 13:50:46 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>,
	Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <200305131738.h4DHclpA012395@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
References: <200305131738.h4DHclpA012395@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Red Hat Canada
Message-Id: <1052848240.27232.407.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:50:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01337.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 13:38, law@redhat.com wrote:

> Does this look better? :-)
> 
Much :)

Now, if we could also get rid of those pesky labels.  You mentioned
something about that, but I forget what.


Diego.