From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19973 invoked by alias); 23 May 2003 19:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23402 invoked from network); 23 May 2003 19:25:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CSDNT99.cdcgy.com) (209.167.52.158) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 May 2003 19:25:18 -0000 Received: from bowman.bowman.gdcanada.com ([172.30.254.5]) by CSDNT99.cdcgy.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id KM0SLB2A; Fri, 23 May 2003 13:24:41 -0600 Received: from d1d6k111.bowman.gdcanada.com (d1d6k111.bowman.gdcanada.com [172.30.254.11]) by bowman.bowman.gdcanada.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47644A429; Fri, 23 May 2003 13:25:15 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?) From: Randy Rude To: DJ Delorie Cc: pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com, peter@baradas.org, kai.ruottu@luukku.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, crossgcc@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200305221733.h4MHXDR13226@greed.delorie.com> References: <20030520053204.ADDB298982@baradas.org> <3EC9F529.6060106@luukku.com> <20030521034551.108CE98982@baradas.org> <20030521063417.3C30B98982@baradas.org> <1053527958.14557.1.camel@d1d6k111.bowman.gdcanada.com> <200305211509.h4LF98K00400@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <200305211738.h4LHcjZ21775@greed.delorie.com> <1053615495.14605.37.camel@d1d6k111.bowman.gdcanada.com> <200305221733.h4MHXDR13226@greed.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 19:40:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1053717915.15462.85.camel@d1d6k111.bowman.gdcanada.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02126.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 11:33, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Oh well, should I now raise a PR on this (or did someone beat me to it)? > > I don't know. You'll have to search the database to find out, but if > there isn't a dup, please create a PR for it. > I created bug #10957 to cover the problem with libiberty. It appears the varargs problem is more or less resolved. Randy