From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9935 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2003 19:55:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9915 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2003 19:55:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.73.237.138) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2003 19:55:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 22507 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2003 19:46:52 -0000 Received: from 227.148-60-66-fuji-dsl.static.surewest.net (HELO doubledemon.codesourcery.com) (mitchell@66.60.148.227) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2003 19:46:52 -0000 Subject: Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) From: Mark Mitchell To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200310040820.54458.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> References: <200310032250.h93Moti1003175@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <200310040820.54458.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC Message-Id: <1065383707.32115.363.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 19:55:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 23:21, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > I see no choice but to do the release anyhow; I can't see how having > > no release is better for the world than having a release with a lot of > > bug fixes, even if it does have some regressions. > > Even regressions wrt to the previous release? See PR 12223. Yes, those are more significant -- but that particular PR has been fixed; it just wans't marked that way. > > If there are 3.3.2 PRs for which a patch has been posted, but not > > reviewed, please (a) put a pointer to the patch in the PR, and (b) add > > me to the Cc list for the PR. I will try to review and/or apply all > > that I get. Please don't send me mail directly; that will only make > > it harder for me to keep track of what's going on. > > Done for 3 PRs. Thanks! I've reviewed them. Yours, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC