From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28728 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2003 18:19:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28689 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2003 18:19:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 18:19:10 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A6wO6-0004Uy-6a for gcc@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A6wP2-0006FK-3Z for gcc@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:18:15 -0400 Received: from [194.25.134.82] (helo=mailout05.sul.t-online.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A6wP0-0006ET-Oi for gcc@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:17:42 -0400 Received: from fwd05.aul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1A6wOz-0006Ld-02; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:17:41 +0200 Received: from localhost.localdomain (VTmBY-ZHoesUViwpZrKlL+zMcLekSi1KzVPRUaf8HqUkuR4gQ25tka@[217.83.18.199]) by fwd05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1A6wOj-08RqAS0; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:17:25 +0200 Subject: Inline asm constraint From: engel_markus@t-online.de (Markus Engel) To: gcc@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1065550820.1522.8.camel@mrks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Seen: false X-ID: VTmBY-ZHoesUViwpZrKlL+zMcLekSi1KzVPRUaf8HqUkuR4gQ25tka X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN,X_NJABL_DIALUP version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 Hello everyone, If I use asm ("movl %1(%%eax), %%eax" :: "i" (4)); it converts it to movl $4(%eax), but I want 4(%eax) Is there a constraint or a method to get rid of the $? If not, could you integrate this is a new release of the c compiler? Markus