From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7693 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2003 00:04:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7644 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 00:04:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 00:04:31 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB9NiEA28974; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:44:14 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBA04Hb04882; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:04:18 -0500 Received: from p4 (vpn50-8.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.8]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBA04G625290; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:04:16 -0800 Subject: Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes From: Andrew MacLeod To: Jan Hubicka Cc: gcc mailing list In-Reply-To: <20031209235635.GA12561@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <1070998524.17667.2860.camel@p4> <20031209235635.GA12561@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1071014657.10776.2903.camel@p4> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 18:56, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > > > > Are we sure we want to GC between passes? :-| > > No, you must manage arrays to be in GGC. What is preventing you from > doing that? > Nothing I suppose. Have we got a ggc_free() yet? I was trying to manage it sensibly, but if we are gong to have a ggc_free() and a zone collector, I probably dont have a lot to gain. At least not enough to make it worth any additional trouble. Andrew