From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11011 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2007 18:51:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 11003 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Dec 2007 18:51:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from VLSI1.ULTRA.NYU.EDU (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:50:51 +0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA00730; Mon, 3 Dec 07 13:50:42 EST From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <10712031850.AA00730@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:51:00 -0000 To: dnovillo@google.com Subject: Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Cc: bernds_cb1@t-online.de, dannyb@google.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, sam@rfc1149.net In-Reply-To: <475448BC.2020103@google.com> References: <2007-12-02-11-05-39+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> <47543DE8.3010003@google.com> <475440E8.4000109@t-online.de> <475448BC.2020103@google.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 > I guess that could work, but that wouldn't give a way into the history > for the change. Several times there is a post-mortem discussion on the > patch, leading to more patches. How about both?