* using9.C failure
@ 2003-12-15 22:03 Mark Mitchell
2003-12-16 3:10 ` Giovanni Bajo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2003-12-15 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: giovannibajo; +Cc: gcc
Giovanni --
I can't quite follow what's going on with the PR c++/2294 situation, but
the bottom line is that using9.C is failing on all systems all the time.
Are these failures a regression? Or, are they just a long-standing bug?
Our policy is not to have FAILing tests for bugs that are not
regressions. The reason for that is that it is very difficult for
people to keep track of what tests are "supposed to FAIL". If it's a
long-standing bug, please XFAIL the test. If it's a regression, please
let me know what's going on with fixing it.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: using9.C failure
2003-12-15 22:03 using9.C failure Mark Mitchell
@ 2003-12-16 3:10 ` Giovanni Bajo
2003-12-16 4:23 ` Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Giovanni Bajo @ 2003-12-16 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Mitchell; +Cc: gcc
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> I can't quite follow what's going on with the PR c++/2294 situation, but
> the bottom line is that using9.C is failing on all systems all the time.
This conservative patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg00857.html approved by Jason will
fix the testcase. I was out last week and couldn't apply it, but will do ASAP.
I'm retesting it right now with today's HEAD. Sorry for the mess.
Giovanni Bajo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: using9.C failure
2003-12-16 3:10 ` Giovanni Bajo
@ 2003-12-16 4:23 ` Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2003-12-16 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Giovanni Bajo; +Cc: gcc
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 17:54, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> > I can't quite follow what's going on with the PR c++/2294 situation, but
> > the bottom line is that using9.C is failing on all systems all the time.
>
> This conservative patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg00857.html approved by Jason will
> fix the testcase. I was out last week and couldn't apply it, but will do ASAP.
> I'm retesting it right now with today's HEAD. Sorry for the mess.
Thanks for dealing with it now, and for fixing the bugs in the first
place!
--
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-16 2:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-15 22:03 using9.C failure Mark Mitchell
2003-12-16 3:10 ` Giovanni Bajo
2003-12-16 4:23 ` Mark Mitchell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).