From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15877 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2004 20:59:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15849 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 20:59:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail13.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.51) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 20:59:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 11777 invoked by uid 503); 14 Jan 2004 20:59:58 -0000 Received: from d213-103-27-130.cust.tele2.fr (HELO ?192.168.0.108?) (laurent%guerby.net@213.103.27.130) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 20:59:58 -0000 Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal From: Laurent GUERBY To: Steven Bosscher Cc: Mark Mitchell , Geoff Keating , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Phil Edwards In-Reply-To: <200401140952.06596.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> References: <90200277-4301-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <014a01c3da65$7ea10620$c00111ac@minax> <200401140952.06596.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074113957.29537.44.camel@pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:59:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00889.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 09:52, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > To me, there are still too many regressions, some of which I view as > > serious. There are 18 wrong-code regressions, which I find particularly > > worrisome. > > There are just 13 wrong-code bugs in Bugzilla. hpux is the biggest > loser with three. There also is one arm bug. One of the other 9 is > about -fwritable-strings. And on the remaining 8, unless I'm mistaken, only three are present on x86: 10684 also present in 3.2 11767 workaround from user: I removed -fnon-call-exceptions when building my code and it works as a workaround for me. 13273 gcj regression from 3.3, assigned Not that bad on the wrong-code side on one major platform. Laurent