From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20224 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 00:55:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20099 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 00:55:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 00:55:12 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0H0Xab20338; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:33:36 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0H0t9M10950; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:55:09 -0500 Received: from [172.16.25.236] (dhcp-172-16-25-236.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.236]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0H0t3b00778; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:55:04 -0800 Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline From: Eric Christopher To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Diego Novillo , gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: <1074298740.3147.79.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074300811.3252.8.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:55:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00987.txt.bz2 > > I'm afraid that's a blocker. On whom though? If it is decided that tree-ssa is the way to go by the group at large whose responsibility is it? The other language maintainers have converted their own bits - is it up to ACT (since no one else works on ADA afaict) to convert or do the tree-ssa people have to do the conversion - after all that has already been done? If ACT decides they don't have time to do this - then is it still a blocker? -eric -- Eric Christopher