From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9383 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 03:26:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9375 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 03:26:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 03:26:13 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0H3PBg21869; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:25:11 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0H3PAE13243; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:25:10 -0500 Received: from dnovillo.cipe.redhat.com (dnovillo.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.106]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0H3P9Xd025801; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:25:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline From: Diego Novillo To: Richard Kenner Cc: Steven Bosscher , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" In-Reply-To: <10401170324.AA15949@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> References: <10401170324.AA15949@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Canada Message-Id: <1074309907.3147.139.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 03:26:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01015.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 22:24, Richard Kenner wrote: > Remember that the last time we had the discussion of the timing of tree-ssa, > people claimed it was "essential" for 3.5 since there was a tremendous > improvement on some C++ cases. So let's see those cases. > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12747 Diego.