From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13415 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 18:06:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13408 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 18:06:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 18:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 11232 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 18:06:45 -0000 Received: from 227.148-60-66-fuji-dsl.static.surewest.net (HELO minax.codesourcery.com) (mitchell@66.60.148.227) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 18:06:45 -0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline From: Mark Mitchell To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Cc: dnovillo@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gp@suse.de, jsm@polyomino.org.uk, law@redhat.com, wilson@tuliptree.org In-Reply-To: <200401171704.i0HH4WWn015521@caip.rutgers.edu> References: <1074298740.3147.79.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <200401170151.i0H1pjEn020723@caip.rutgers.edu> <1074310588.3147.153.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <200401171704.i0HH4WWn015521@caip.rutgers.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC Message-Id: <1074362816.3537.9.camel@minax.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 18:06:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01092.txt.bz2 > I still think we should give high priority to some of the issues > raised like regressions and documentation, but these don't have to be > blockers as long as they is a commitment to address them. (Again, my > mental model is the new C++ parser.) I can hardly object to that mental model, can I? :-) I'll go back and look at this dicussion and offer what thoughts I have. I tend to read the GCC mailing lists in a somewhat batchy fashion; people should feel free to copy me explicitly on things that they particularly want my input about. Thank you for doing so here. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC