From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25042 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 19:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25035 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 19:57:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 19:57:55 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0JJYPO07487; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:34:25 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0JJvpM22928; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:57:52 -0500 Received: from [192.168.123.101] (vpn26-3.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.26.3]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0JJvpb08102; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:57:51 -0800 Subject: Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources. From: Eric Christopher To: Karel Gardas Cc: GCC Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074542159.11041.5.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:57:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01363.txt.bz2 > OK, I have thought that the -O0 -g (perhaps) build is the most important > from compile-time performance view, as it is probably used for > development... > Don't get me wrong, both are useful. For some reason my mind is hitting that we're doing more stuff up front to allow for better optimization later though. > > Thanks for the mail though. Perhaps a bug report into bugzilla with a > > url on where someone can download the .ii files would be best :) > > I will try to provide something this week. Thanks. -eric -- Eric Christopher