From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26670 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2004 23:26:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26643 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2004 23:26:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2004 23:26:45 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i13N2Yn00936; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:02:34 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i13NQbM24178; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:26:37 -0500 Received: from [172.16.25.252] (dhcp-172-16-25-252.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i13NQab12698; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:26:36 -0800 Subject: Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS? From: Eric Christopher To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Zack Weinberg , gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1075850149.40202ba582c06@webmail.polimi.it> References: <004e01c3ea76$c081d300$8a41af83@kingkong> <20040203211454.GA16126@redhat.com> <87wu7397k4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <1075850149.40202ba582c06@webmail.polimi.it> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075850560.3860.12.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:26:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 > > Yes; lookup tables instead of binary searching. I also hope to learn something > while reading the code -- low priority things are good for beginners (like me). Actually it'll help readability too. It being so much easier to know what 'c' is in rtx_class than something like say "COMMUTATIVE_BINARY". :) -eric -- Eric Christopher