From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-92260-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1147 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2004 19:17:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1134 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2004 19:17:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 19:17:02 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i25JGwb02928;
	Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:16:58 -0500
Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i25JGv811249;
	Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:16:57 -0500
Received: from [10.0.0.106] (dnovillo.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.106])
	by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i25JGsXd017612;
	Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:16:54 -0500
Subject: Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
To: Devang Patel <dpatel@apple.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
   "gcc@gcc.gnu.org list" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, Dorit Naishlos <DORIT@il.ibm.com>,
   Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1E340141-6ED8-11D8-AEC8-000393A91CAA@apple.com>
References: <4E8BFBB8-6E16-11D8-9322-000393A91CAA@apple.com>
	 <20040304210254.GB8416@redhat.com>
	 <1E340141-6ED8-11D8-AEC8-000393A91CAA@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Red Hat Canada
Message-Id: <1078514261.20630.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:17:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00341.txt.bz2

On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 14:05, Devang Patel wrote:

>    a = select a1, a2, c
>    b = select b1, b2, c1
>    c = select a1, b1, c2
> 
> We want to put all three statements in one basic block.
> 
Why would it?  They still look like a MODIFY_EXPR.

	MODIFY_EXPR <a, COND_EXPR <a1, a2, c>>
	MODIFY_EXPR <b, COND_EXPR <b1, b2, c1>>
	MODIFY_EXPR <c, COND_EXPR <a1, b1, c2>>


Diego.