From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20050 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2004 15:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19990 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2004 15:35:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2004 15:35:54 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2DFZs07029091; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:35:54 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2DFZrS10431; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:35:53 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.106] (dnovillo.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.106]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2DFZqXd025365; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:35:52 -0500 Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status From: Diego Novillo To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: GCC Development In-Reply-To: <000e01c4090b$4b9f5540$5adf1d97@philo> References: <000e01c4090b$4b9f5540$5adf1d97@philo> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Canada Message-Id: <1079192133.3173.319.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:35:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00607.txt.bz2 On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 09:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Are the performance problems on SPEC2000int (and the improvements in > SPEC2000fp) concentrated in a single test? > No. If you look at the individual tests, perlbmk and crafty are the more problematic http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/tree-ssa-branch/individual-run-ratio.html Jeff Law and Andrew Macleod have both profiled SPEC in more detail and had some ideas. > Hope this helps, > It does. Thanks. Diego.