From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-93223-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23756 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2004 15:27:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23736 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2004 15:27:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2004 15:27:10 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MFR8WA013355;
	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:27:08 -0500
Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2MFR8j17451;
	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:27:08 -0500
Received: from [10.0.0.106] (dnovillo.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.106])
	by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2MFR6xo029582;
	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:27:07 -0500
Subject: Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
To: Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <10403221528.AA13231@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
References: <10403221528.AA13231@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Red Hat Canada
Message-Id: <1079969185.31835.68.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:27:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01304.txt.bz2

On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 10:28, Richard Kenner wrote:
>     Would you be willing to apply your patch to tree-ssa at the same time?
> 
> I don't currently have that branch checked out or have set up testing
> procedures for it, so I think that would be a bad idea.
>
So, you aren't willing to help with merge conflicts?


Diego.