* [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24
@ 2004-03-26 18:22 Diego Novillo
2004-03-26 18:37 ` law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Diego Novillo @ 2004-03-26 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Bootstrapped and tested x86, x86-64 and alpha. We have new c-torture
regressions that are not present in mainline:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2c.c execution
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2d.c execution
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
20040313-1.c is the test case for PR 14470. The two loop failures
happen only at -Os on x86, it does not seem to be a tree optimizer
failure because we emit the same trees. I'm looking at those today.
The builtin-nonneg failure is another case of tree-ssa not folding
builtins properly.
None of the failures seemed important enough to hold the merge which was
already getting old.
Diego.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24
2004-03-26 18:22 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24 Diego Novillo
@ 2004-03-26 18:37 ` law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: law @ 2004-03-26 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Diego Novillo; +Cc: gcc
In message <1080318686.4600.141.camel@localhost.localdomain>, Diego Novillo wri
tes:
>
>Bootstrapped and tested x86, x86-64 and alpha. We have new c-torture
>regressions that are not present in mainline:
>
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040313-1.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2c.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2d.c execution
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-nonneg-1.c (test for excess errors)
>
>20040313-1.c is the test case for PR 14470. The two loop failures
>happen only at -Os on x86, it does not seem to be a tree optimizer
>failure because we emit the same trees. I'm looking at those today.
>The builtin-nonneg failure is another case of tree-ssa not folding
>builtins properly.
>
>None of the failures seemed important enough to hold the merge which was
>already getting old.
Agreed.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-26 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-26 18:22 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24 Diego Novillo
2004-03-26 18:37 ` law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).