From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-98605-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3762 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2004 21:48:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3739 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 21:48:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 21:48:05 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5TLm5e1032759;
	Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:48:05 -0400
Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5TLm4023219;
	Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:48:04 -0400
Received: from [10.0.0.106] (dnovillo.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.106])
	by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5TLm2vU017822;
	Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:48:03 -0400
Subject: Re: bootstrap failure on ia64
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>,
        "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <40E1CB36.1060003@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <200406291903.i5TJ3Wr24722@tin.geop.uc.edu>
	 <40E1CB36.1060003@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Red Hat Canada
Message-Id: <1088545682.24130.159.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:34:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01936.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 16:04, Richard Guenther wrote:

> > Can you guys try it again after
> > 2004-06-29  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@codesourcery.com>
> > 
> >         * vec.h (VEC_T_safe_push, VEC_T_safe_insert) Tweak for when
> >         size_t is bigger than int.
> 
> That seems to have fixed it.
> 
Yes.  It worked here too.


Diego.