From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kryn@in2p3.fr>
Received: from cczrelay01.in2p3.fr (cczrelay05.in2p3.fr [134.158.66.155])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A623E3968C1B
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:25:50 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A623E3968C1B
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=in2p3.fr
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kryn@in2p3.fr
Received: from [192.168.1.58] (143.24.149.77.rev.sfr.net [77.149.24.143])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by cczrelay01.in2p3.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 13EFPi9M028034
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:25:49 +0200
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at cczrelay01
Subject: Re: removing toxic emailers
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
References: <aebbc847-e8c0-83d9-976c-d8b4567ba53f@acm.org>
 <20210414131843.GA4138043@thyrsus.com>
 <7e126821-f66c-869a-a7bc-6c19a3c1f017@netcologne.de>
 <CAH6eHdSzNwTmp7baRSNN3LRiCQLYqV8iPCOTvBeoqV1OvdH1fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Didier Kryn <kryn@in2p3.fr>
Message-ID: <1090d362-3a38-1e02-7d7b-b05431acc057@in2p3.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:25:44 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdSzNwTmp7baRSNN3LRiCQLYqV8iPCOTvBeoqV1OvdH1fg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:25:52 -0000

Le 14/04/2021 =C3=A0 16:49, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 15:39, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>> On 14.04.21 15:18, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>> A strong norm about off-list behavior and politics being
>>> out of bounds here is also helpful.
>> That would have banned the whole discussion about the potential
>> fork from the start.
> No, because once again, I raised the topic of a fork because I do not
> feel that association with GNU or FSF benefits the GCC project. I did
> not say "we have to cancel them because I don't like their politics"
> (as it happens, I do like their politics, which is why I've spent two
> decades writing copyleft code for GCC, I just think they have failed
> to evolve and are sadly irrelevant today).
=C2=A0

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Well,=C2=A0 /I just think they have failed to evolve a=
nd are sadly
irrelevant today/=C2=A0 boils down to=C2=A0 /They have again elected RMS.=
/ The
word=C2=A0 /today/=C2=A0 sounds like a reference to the=C2=A0 /modern sta=
ndards/=C2=A0 I
have read before on the subject. (~:

-- =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Didier