From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
To: Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
Cc: neroden@fastmail.fm, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093863754.17130.27.camel@pc.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10408301022.AA24170@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 12:22, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > Is Ada functioning a requirement for the release? If so it seems a
> > moderately bad idea to go into stage 3 with it totally busted.
>
> The answer to the first question has always been "no". But in practice,
> my expectation is that it will work fine on the release.
We had a barely working Ada compiler in 3.3 (fortunately enough for
bootstraping 3.4 and 3.5 on x86 and x86_64), a fully working compiler on
3.4 (100% pass on x86 at -O0) and it looks like 3.5 will have 100% pass
on x86 and x86_64 at -O2.
I believe it's reasonable now to make it a requirement that Ada works in
future GCC releases, at least on x86 and x86_64 with no regression.
Laurent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-30 10:44 Richard Kenner
2004-08-30 11:27 ` Laurent GUERBY [this message]
2004-08-30 13:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-08-30 18:28 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-30 20:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-08-30 20:25 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-31 5:27 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-08-31 9:42 ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-08-30 20:14 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-30 20:34 ` Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-30 20:53 ` Ada policy Zack Weinberg
2004-08-30 20:55 ` Richard Guenther
2004-08-30 21:04 ` Richard Henderson
2004-08-30 21:24 ` Diego Novillo
2004-08-30 22:25 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 1:13 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-08-31 2:37 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 2:54 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-08-31 3:00 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 3:28 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-08-31 3:41 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 4:22 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-08-31 12:55 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 15:02 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-31 15:36 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 13:06 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 15:10 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-31 18:10 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-31 18:30 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-08-31 18:55 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-01 17:12 ` Kai Henningsen
2004-09-01 17:32 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 18:59 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 20:05 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-08-31 20:26 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 20:53 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-08-31 20:56 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-08-31 21:11 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-31 21:50 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 19:02 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 19:28 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-31 19:36 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 18:42 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 13:10 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-31 13:47 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-30 21:05 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-08-31 22:02 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-08-31 22:11 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-31 22:14 ` Robert Dewar
2004-08-31 0:13 ` Florian Weimer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-30 10:17 GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Richard Kenner
2004-08-30 14:48 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 18:08 ` Mike Stump
2004-08-30 4:33 Nathanael Nerode
2004-08-30 0:59 Richard Kenner
2004-08-29 23:49 Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 0:03 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-08-30 0:33 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 0:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 0:25 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 0:48 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 0:57 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 1:04 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 1:12 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-08-30 1:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 10:11 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-08-30 2:46 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-08-30 3:09 ` Matt Austern
2004-08-30 18:02 ` Joe Buck
2004-08-30 3:32 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 4:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 4:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 4:43 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 5:09 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 5:27 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 5:30 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30 6:57 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 9:24 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 10:13 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-08-30 10:26 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 16:34 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 11:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-08-30 10:03 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 15:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 15:21 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 17:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
2004-08-30 1:09 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 1:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 7:34 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 8:15 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 14:16 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 15:10 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 3:03 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 3:20 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-31 17:35 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-08-30 10:50 ` Dorit Naishlos
2004-08-30 15:12 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 14:26 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 15:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 15:05 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 17:08 ` Diego Novillo
2004-08-31 3:25 ` Devang Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093863754.17130.27.camel@pc.site \
--to=laurent@guerby.net \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
--cc=neroden@fastmail.fm \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).