From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23147 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 22:15:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23133 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 22:15:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bluesmobile.specifixinc.com) (64.220.152.98) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 22:15:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by bluesmobile.specifixinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ED116230; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? From: James E Wilson To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040910220754.GA13666@lucon.org> References: <20040910000026.GA25099@lucon.org> <20040910095023.GF378@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040910165450.GA8456@lucon.org> <414211DD.5030900@specifixinc.com> <20040910220754.GA13666@lucon.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1094854554.10265.26.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 00:10:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 15:07, H. J. Lu wrote: > Is there a version which will apply to the current source tree? I have no idea. Try asking the authors of the patch. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com