From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16852 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2010 21:43:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 16840 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2010 21:43:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from VLSI1.ULTRA.NYU.EDU (HELO vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu) (128.122.140.213) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:43:51 +0000 Received: by vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (4.1/1.34) id AA02786; Mon, 28 Jun 10 17:44:39 EDT From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Message-Id: <11006282144.AA02786@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:33:00 -0000 To: burnus@net-b.de Subject: Re: Patch pinging Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4C29132C.8090302@net-b.de> References: <201006071901.03000.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <4C0D4A26.6080703@oracle.com> <4C0D5F0E.9030401@redhat.com> <4C0D616D.10809@oracle.com> <4C0D9979.90603@sbcglobal.net> <4C271A9B.4030503@net-b.de> <1277758277.29547.16.camel@glin ka> <4C29132C.8090302@net-b.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00795.txt.bz2 > "If a contributor wants the FSF to publish only a pseudonym, that is ok. > The contributor should say this, and state the desired pseudonym, when > answering the request- form. The actual legal papers will use the real > name, but the FSF will publish only the pseudonym." I was unaware of that. I stand corrected (but still don't understand why anybody would want to do that in a forum such as this).