From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9859 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 01:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9829 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 01:21:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 01:21:44 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAN1KaR2008091; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:20:36 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAN1Kar13765; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:20:36 -0500 Received: from vpn83-122.boston.redhat.com (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX188CsvFrSBQqP84ee7QkvBIMs663CRjP5E@vpn83-122.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.122]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAN1KYoS011337; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:20:35 -0500 Subject: Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving From: Diego Novillo To: Kazu Hirata Cc: Mark Mitchell , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" In-Reply-To: <20041122.201559.34387675.kazu@cs.umass.edu> References: <200411230026.iAN0QqeO005220@sirius.codesourcery.com> <20041122.201559.34387675.kazu@cs.umass.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Canada Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1101172833.24001.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00781.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 20:15 -0500, Kazu Hirata wrote: > Are compile-time regressions considered to be regressions? I am > guessing the answer is "no" to be on the safe side. > I certainly hope they are. Several PRs are of this nature and compile time problems are among the #1 complaints I've heard about mainline. Diego.